On 7/3/2020 2:55 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticuswrote: > On 7/3/20 5:39 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> On 7/2/20 6:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-business wrote: >>>> CFJ, submitted to Referee: The above-quoted attempt to pay cards on >>>> nch’s behalf was unsuccessful because attempting to pay 18 Victory Cards >>>> and/or 18 Justice Cards in 4 sets of 4 is self-contradictory. >>> >>> I assign this CFJ to Jason. I believe that it is CFJ 3861, but I will >>> leave it to the Clerk of the Courts to assign. >>> >> Judged FALSE. > I grant a reward of 5 coins to Jason for eir timely judgment. > > For the cases that were submitted to me, do I have to issue a weekly report? >
hmmm... Rule 991/33 > The Arbitor's weekly report includes a summary of recent judicial > case activity, including open and recently-judged cases, recent > judicial assignments, and a list of players interested in judging. Does this imply "specific case" reporting obligations that would transfer due to the text below, or is more of a bulk specification? >From Rule 2246/6 > When a CFJ is submitted to the Referee, the Referee receives all > obligations and powers for the specific case that the Arbitor > would otherwise receive due to being Arbitor. This takes > precedence over Rules that would otherwise assign duties and < powers regarding a judicial case to the Arbitor. No idea! Arguments for bulk: accidentally leaving out one Arbitor-submitted case from a larger report wouldn't be a gross error, and therefore (by precedent) the report missing a case would still satisfy my weekly duty. Therefore there's no "per-case" obligation for the Referee to receive. [I'm not forbidden from putting them in my report anyway so I will.] -G.
