On 7/22/20 6:54 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote: > On 2020-07-22 16:41, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via > agora-discussion wrote: >> On 7/22/20 6:32 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote: >>> On 2020-07-20 16:12, Reuben Staley wrote: >>>> On 2020-07-19 18:12, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote: >>>>> That is to say, I award myself a black glitter, this time on the Public >>>>> Forum. >>>> As it turns out I do not have a black ribbon yet so the above claim >>>> failed. I award myself a black ribbon. >>> As it turns out that was a-d. >>> >>> I award myself a black ribbon. >>> >> You don't have to actively award it, so it doesn't matter. >> > Are you certain? The ribbon terminology is a bit weird but I believe > that I do. >
Rule 2438 awards you the black ribbon because of this paragraph: > Black (K): A statute CAN, as part of its effect, cause a person to > earn a Black Ribbon. When this occurs, this Rule awards that > person a Black Ribbon. The proposal (a statute) caused you to earn a Black Ribbon, so the rule awarded it to you (fulfilling the security restriction on ribbon ownership). -- Jason Cobb
