On 7/26/20 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > > On 7/26/2020 9:40 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> On 7/26/20 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: >>> >>> H. Publius, >>> >>> Another diplonomic rules question! >>> >>> The original Diplomacy Rules say: >>>> A unit may not retreat to the province from where the dislodging unit >>>> came or to an "embattled" province, meaning one left vacant by a >>>> bounce/standoff that turn. >>> (https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Diplomacy/Rules) >>> >>> Current Rule 22 says: >>>> 22. A dislodged unit must retreat to an adjacent province. Retreats >>>> can’t be convoyed or supported. If two or more units are ordered to >>>> retreat to the same province, they all must be disbanded. If a country >>>> fails to order a retreat when necessary, the unit is disbanded. >>> >>> Reading this on its own, you could retreat anywhere adjacent (even to >>> occupied territories!) Obviously that's not true so there are limits not >>> explicitly spelled out in R22. Do those limits apply to retreating to >>> "where the dislodging unit came from" or to "embattled but empty" >>> provinces under the current R22, as per the original Dip rules? >> >> Yes, it couldn't retreat to a province occupied by a dislodging unit or >> a unit that it couldn't have moved to. >> > > But 'embattled but empty' can be retreated to? > >
Since the unit couldn't have moved there, no. -- ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, Herald, Referee, Tailor, Pirate Champion, Badge of the Great Agoran Revival, Badge of the Salted Earth
