Here's a draft to fix some numbering problems; more details within.
-Aris
---
It has come to my attention that there are two Proposal 8495s. I will correct
this by assigning each a new ID number that unambiguously refers to only it
It is not my intent to invalidate the old ID numbers where they do not
create ambiguity, merely to provide new ones for ease of reference.
"nopenopenope" by Gaelan is now Proposal 8498.
"Please stand by" by G. is now Proposal 8499.
An index of the renumbered proposals follows.
ID Author(s) AI Title
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8498*^ Gaelan 3.0 nopenopenope
8499p^ G. 1.0 Please stand by
Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
<ID># : Ordinary proposal, unset chamber.
<ID>e : Economy ministry proposal (ordinary).
<ID>f : Efficiency ministry proposal (ordinary).
<ID>j : Justice ministry proposal (ordinary).
<ID>l : Legislation ministry proposal (ordinary).
<ID>p : Participation ministry proposal (ordinary).
<ID>^ : Sponsored proposal.
The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8498
Title: nopenopenope
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Gaelan
Co-authors:
Repeal rule 2633.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 8499
Title: Please stand by
Adoption index: 1.0
Author: G.
Co-authors:
Create a rule, "Please Stand By", with the following text:
Normal service will resume shortly.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
