On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 7:49 PM Falsifian via agora-discussion <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > Okay, it's reasonable to take advantage of precedent that way. Does the > precedent actually talk about "free will" in those words? > > If it weren't obvious that the word "willingly" is trying to do > something special in this context, I might interpret it with some > mundane sense that isn't really about "free will" (e.g. willingly could > just not offering objections or resistence; doing something without > needing to be forced). But I guess that sort of meaning wouldn't really > make sense in that context anyway. > > Anyway, I remain okay with the "willingly" wording.
CFJ 1895. Over a decade old, and I'm sure I could find something more recent, but it's very comprehensive. -Aris
