On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:14 AM Sarah Strange via agora-discussion < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:58 PM Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Jan 28, 2021, at 12:55 AM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Jan 27, 2021, at 11:07 PM, Aris Merchant via agora-discussion < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Unless I’m missing something, this repeals the definition of > > instruments and adds a new one. > > >> > > >> That's intentional, yes. Instruments would fill the hole that statutes > > do now. > > > > > > Bah, I meant to say that it *fails* to add a new one. > > > > > > Gaelan > > > > Aha, it's in 1688/10, which the proposal applies S->I to: > > > > "A statute [which would be replaced with instrument] is a document with > > positive Power." > > > > Gaelan > > > You can't have negative power or 0 power by the definition of power, can > you? Something can have a power of 0, but not negative. Nearly everything has a power of 0, including both me and you. -Aris >
