On 2/27/2021 12:04 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote: > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2014-October/010878.html > > * 2018-04-06: G. adds more entries with a deregistration date of "5 Apr 94" > > > https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2018-April/012336.html > > (#) I am guessing G. really meant "5 Apr 94 or earlier", in which > case adding a "<=" to the entries e added would make sense. > > G. added the new entries after Timothy, even though that puts the > dates out of order. If it could be established that Timothy > deregistered after 1994-04-05, I would move eir entry to the end of > the 1994 section; otherwise I'll leave it as is since I really don't > know.
The ones I "added" were shifted from "Left in 1995" to "Left in 1994", probably because the 5 Apr 94 got shifted from "registration" to "deregistration". We can see the process: omd's 2014 report, first entry in the "Left in 1995" section: Chuck ccarroll at students.wisc.edu 5 Apr 94<= <unknown> (implying Chuck registered on or before 5 Apr 94; deregistration unknown) At some point the <unknowns> were changed to blanks, leading to this in 2017: https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2017-November/012133.html Chuck ccarroll at students.wisc.edu 5 Apr 94 (implying Chuck registered on 5 Apr 94, deregistration blank). Then I must have had a data entry error when I took over the job, leading to this in 2018: Chuck ccarroll at students.wisc.edu 5 Apr 94 (5 Apr 94 shifted in columns from a registration to deregistration date, and therefore shifted from "Left in 95" section to "Left in 94" section). Overall, I think omd's entries that include "<=" and "<unknown>" to keep columns from shifting is the most accurate, although I'm not sure Chuck emself ever deregistered, so Chuck's "Left in 2001" entry should be kept and the 1994/1995 entry deleted?
