Re-sending; my email configuration was broken. ----- Forwarded message from Falsifian <[email protected]> -----
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2021 14:58:49 +0000 From: Falsifian <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: BUS: [proposal] Supporter/Objector clarification On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 01:26:58PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > I submit (but do not pend) the following proposal: > > Title: Supporter/Objector clarification > > Adoption index: 3.0 > > Author: Jason > > Coauthors: > > { > > Amend Rule 2124 by replacing the following: > > { > > The above notwithstanding, if an action is to be performed without > N objections or with N Agoran consent, and an objection to an > intent to perform it has been withdrawn within the past 24 hours, > then Agora is not Satisfied with that intent. > > The above notwithstanding, Agora is not satisfied with an intent > if the Speaker has objected to it in the last 48 hours. > > A person CANNOT support or object to an announcement of intent > before the intent is announced, or after e has withdrawn the same > type of response. > > } > > with the following: > > { > > The above notwithstanding, if an action is to be performed without N > objections or with N Agoran consent, and an entity has ceased to be an > Objector to that intent within the past 24 hours, then Agora is not > Satisfied with that intent. > > The above notwithstanding, Agora is not Satisfied with an intent if the > Speaker has become an Objector to it in the last 48 hours. > > An entity is not considered a Supporter or Objector to an intent solely > due to a purported support or objection made before the intent was > announced. An entity is not considered a Supporter to an intent if e has > previously ceased to be a Supporter, and e is not considered an Objector > to an intent if e has previously ceased to be an Objector. > > } > > [In each paragraph, use Objector/Supportor status instead of evaluating > whether objections were withdrawn. For instance, it has been previously > pointed out (in private conversation) that the Speaker could potentially > completely block an intent by objecting multiple times. Additionally, in > the third paragraph, extend the restrictions to entities instead of just > persons (since the definition of Supporter/Objector applies to entities, > rather than persons).] > > } > > -- > Jason Cobb Thanks. Good idea, and looks good. -- Falsifian ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Falsifian
