On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 6:38 PM Cuddle Beam via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> I don't believe we have enough players to make this work. > > BUT! What if we made this a Tournament! Compressing participation into a > single hyped moment should be enough to make it work. > > > > > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:36 AM nix via agora-discussion < > agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/15/21 7:13 PM, ais523 via agora-discussion wrote: > > > The basic idea is to add an asymmetrical/political resource > > > distribution mechanism with lots of tension (being in a large Cabal > > > means it gets Cards to hand out, but it'll have to try to split them > > > more ways; and different Cabals get to try out different ways to > > > distribute the Cards they get, competing to try to attract players). > > > > > > We might want to remove some resource distribution mechanisms, or > > > increase the cost in Products of some actions, in order to balance out > > > the increased Card supply. > > > > Love this proto already. Assorted thoughts: > > > > Agree we might have to rethink how cards are gained if we do this. > > > > Players not in the cabalogarchy should get compensation, such as a > > monthly product. > > > > I would tie the cabal award to the month rather than 30 days. That > > matches with some other mechanical trends we have currently. > > > > Not sure what, if anything, discourages two cabals from cooperating here > > to get more cards. > > > > Do we have enough active players to maintain 3 cabals and make them > > dynamic? > > > > -- > > nix > > Webmastor, Ministor, Herald > > > > > > > I wonder if we made three pre-existing teams like Red Yellow Blue and then allowed players to choose their team would it be more easy to maintain three teams with a small player base? Or would everyone just join the same team. -- >From R. Lee
