On Sun, 2021-09-05 at 15:16 +1000, Telna via agora-business wrote: > The document that this CFJ is about does not purport to be a report - in > fact, it explicitly purports not to be one. This means that we cannot > assume that a list of stones contained within is in fact a list of all > stones. Can we get this information from elsewhere in the document? > Well... we do not know. This CFJ is a hypothetical, and the document > being posited does not exist in reality. Without being able to view its > exact form, we cannot know whether the list of all stones would purport > to be a list of all stones. This results in the case being ultimately > undecidable. Accordingly, I see no other choice but to DISMISS.
I was interested primarily in the case where it clearly was a list of all stones, but you answered that already. So I'm satisfied with this judgement, as it answered my question, and I apologise for unintentionally leaving that important point unclear. I award Telna a Blue Ribbon. -- ais523
