On 4/11/22 13:49, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > On 4/11/2022 10:40 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> No, it's not reasonable to expect new players to read through decades of >> judgements. However, that doesn't eliminate the fact that the precedent >> exists. Generally relevant precedents will be brought up by people aware >> of them when needed. > I mean, it *might* be reasonable for a new player to think "I'm putting in > a high-powered proposal that claims to freeze agora, directly trying to > loophole something that the rules explicitly say is a High Crime and > shouldn't be done - maybe there's reasons I shouldn't do that." > > -G. >
Yes, sorry, fair point. I was speaking generally, not thinking about this specific case for that bit. -- Jason Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
