G. wrote:
On 6/12/2022 9:35 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
CFJ: "The entity at one point known as Rule 2658 is a Rule."
CFJ: "The entity at one point known as Rule 2658 has performed at least
one amendment of a Rule."
CFJ: "The entity at one point known as Rule 2658 has been amended at
once during the time when it is/was a Rule."
The final CFJ (CFJ 3965) comes down to whether (3) "this rule is repealed"
succeeded after the amendments/failed amendements in (2) were complete?
Seems like the final CFJ is slightly broken in its wording (perhaps
intended to ask "has been amended at least once"), but pretty clearly
true (it amended itself at least once, namely while removing ~> <~
delimited portions of rules).
It also seems pretty clear that Rule 2658 repealed itself. Rule 105
(Rule Changes) says that an ambiguous rule change renders *that* rule
change ineffective, but also that rule changes occur sequentially rather
than simultaneously. Rule 2658 specified an order of
a) (multiple changes) repeal other rules in order listed
b) (multiple changes) amend rules containing ~> <~ in ascending
numerical order
c) repeal self
and, whatever happened to the last few changes within b), change c)
was always after all of those.
