On 7/24/22 20:04, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 12:56 AM secretsnail9 via agora-official > <[email protected]> wrote: >> 8821~ nix, Jason, secretsnail 3.0 More Intuitive Rule Changes > Opinion of the rulekeepor sought: > > In all previous history, the phrase: > > "Retitle rule X to Y, and Amend it to read..." would be listed as two > separate historical annotations in the FLR, I'm quite concerned that > changing this to: > > "Amed Rule X by retitling it Y and changing it to read..." would > greatly obscure historical, reconstruction, as the amendment would be > a single action (retitling and text change on a single line of > history). > > Often, when looking at historical annotations to figure out which > proposal changed what, retitles are milestones which signify > significant change in the function of the rule. Would this > information be obscured/lost under this proposal?
I'd be inclined to record it as a single amendment, but I could potentially include "amended (title)" or "amended (text/title)"? In any case that would require me to write more code *grumble grumble*. -- Jason Cobb Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
