On 9/12/22 20:31, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > There's also the clause in Rule 2630 "The Administrative State": "An > officer SHALL NOT violate eir office's administrative regulations in the > discharge of eir office." It's not too relevant to this case, but there may > be an issue when violating a regulation, as violations are a regulated > action that can be performed only using the methods explicitly specified in > the Rules (not regulations) for performing the given action. Rule 2545 > (Auctions) handles this nicely: "SHALL NOT violate requirements that > auction's method that are clearly intended to be punishable as rules > violations", the typo aside.
SHALL (NOT)s do not create regulated actions anymore. -- Jason Cobb Arbitor, Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
