I would not like to be considered a coauthor on this one, as IIRC my only contribution was to speak against the cfj changes which you kept, so I don’t endorse that. I think having switches that turn on and off on tracking like that have the potential to create some significant level of confusion with self-ratification eg if a switch is left off the list, then ceases to be tracked invisibly, does it self ratify as an open case and kick off the judge? Or since it’s a single switch type, it’s also not clear to me that a “allegedly complete list” of the tracked ones wouldn’t ratify the untracked ones to the default state. Just raises a whole can of worms that could affect the status of ancient cases in a way we really might not want.
-G. On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:04 PM Edward Murphy via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote: > Proposal: Limited tracking > (AI = 3, co-authors = Janet, G.) > > Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by adding this paragraph to the list item > regarding tracking: > > Alternatively, if the rules assign an office to track only some > instances of a switch, then the report includes the value of > those instances, but a document purporting to be such a list is > not self-ratifying. > > Amend Rule 2606 (Proposal Classes) by replacing this text: > > Proposals created since the enactment of this rule have a secured > untracked Class switch with possible values ordinary (the default) > and democratic. > > with this text: > > Proposals created since the enactment of this rule have a secured > Class switch, tracked by the Promotor for proposals in the > Proposal Pool, with possible values ordinary (the default) and > democratic. > > Amend Rule 1950 (Decisions with Adoption Indices) by replacing this > text: > > Adoption index (AI) is an untracked switch possessed by Agoran > decisions and proposals, secured at power 2. > > with this text: > > Adoption index (AI) is a switch possessed by Agoran decisions and > proposals, secured at power 2, tracked by the Assessor for Agoran > decisions not yet resolved, and by the Promotor for proposals in > the Proposal Pool. > > Amend Rule 991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing this text: > > Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with possible values of any > person or former person, or "unassigned" (default). > > with this text: > > Judge is a CFJ switch, tracked by the Arbitor for CFJs that have > been unassigned at any point during the past week, with possible > values of any person or former person, or "unassigned" (default). >
