This has been the best possible outcome lør. 20. mai 2023, 11:07 p.m. skrev Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org>:
> On 5/21/23 01:59, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote: > > I counter by instead submitting the following proposal: > > > > {Adoption index = 3 > > > > [Stop making small changes to fix things. This security issue happens all > > the time.] > > > Exactly what non-small change would you want here? Your proposal is > "small", too. This is really getting annoying. > > > > Enact the following rule:"By default and unless otherwise specified, > > assets, switches, and eir properties are secured at the power level of > the > > rule that defines them."} > > > First, NttPF. > > Second, you've put the "adoption index" inside the text of the proposal. > > Third, why is this in a new rule? There's a perfectly good rule this can > go into (R1688). > > Fourth, there are likely to be breakages, and I find it unlikely you > audited the entire ruleset for things that might break. > > Fifth, when things inevitably do break, how would they be fixed? In all > likelihood, more small proposals, fixing them piecewise as they're > found. This isn't preventing "small changes" at all. > > -- > Janet Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > >