On 5/24/23 13:28, Forest Sweeney via agora-business wrote:
I vote AFFIRM on this decision. The reasoning may be "wrong", but we are voting on the final outcome which is perfectly acceptable. That and just because a reasoning is hasty or simple doesn't determine that the reasoning is wrong. Finally, the judgement almost seems to read "ok this mechanic and reading is on the way out" but being unable to represent that in a judgement, Yachay resorted to what e could. A future case can use this case if it comes up to determine the final outcome.
How is it on the way out if it's being reinforced by a decision?
-- nix Prime Minister, Herald
