I think the proper way to repeal anything is to tweak and break it so subtly it's finally scammed, then you repeal it. That seems to be the way things go. Or at least the fun way. Maybe we just need new stones, after all!
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023, 7:52 AM Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business < [email protected]> wrote: > I retract the Proposal named "Stone Repeal" and I submit the following > Proposal: > > Name: Stone Repeal > AI: 2 > Author: Yachay > Co-authors: None > > Repeal Rules 2640, 2641, 2642, 2643, 2644, and 2645 in ascending numerical > order by ID > > // Comment: This November, this rule will have existed for three years. > Tragically, I haven't seen or experienced any interesting gameplay from it. > I believe it's time to move on. > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 2:32 PM Janet Cobb via agora-business < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 10/31/23 05:19, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote: > > > I submit the following Proposal: > > > > > > Name: Stone Repeal > > > AI: 2 > > > Author: Yachay > > > Co-authors: None > > > > > > Repeal Rule 2640, 2641, 2642, 2643, 2644, 2645 > > > > > > /* Comment: This November, this rule will have existed for three years. > > > Tragically, I haven't seen or experienced any interesting gameplay from > > it. > > > I believe it's time to move on. > > > > > > It's the only gameplay we have right now. > > > > Also, these proposals usually include "in order" or "in ascending > > numerical order by ID" to avoid the rule changes accidentally being > > simultaneous. > > > > -- > > Janet Cobb > > > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason > > > > >
