Re: DIS: CFJ 4062 draft-judged TRUE

[Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion]

> On Mar 12, 2024, at 2:39 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion 
> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 9, 2024, at 6:37 PM, nix via agora-business 
>> <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On 1/28/24 00:59, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>>> I CFJ: "Proposal 9051, as part of its effect, applied a rule change."
>>> 
>> 
>> I number this CFJ 4062. I assign CFJ 4062 to Gaelan.
> 
> This is a draft judgement, as I haven’t done this in a while and would
> like assurance I’m not utterly off-base.

*taps earpiece* I have been informed that I was utterly off-base.
Specifically, I was looking at the post-patch version of 105.

Anyway, I think the thrust of my ruling is still true: even
without the patch, the proposal text wasn’t ambiguous, as there
was only one possible interpretation.

Gaelan