> On Mar 12, 2024, at 3:04 PM, nix via agora-discussion > <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > I haven't started drafting, but not sure I quite agree with this. A rule > change is defined as "any effect that falls into the above classes", so > the "full text" would be the full text of the change. Your reading seems > like it'd make more sense if 105 said "the full text of the changed > rules" or something to the effect.
Ah yes, good point. It’s a little weird because an “effect” is an an abstract thing that doesn’t really have text, per se - there are lots of ways to describe the same amendment. But I think you’re right that this isn’t a game- breaking problem, even if the wording could be improved. Gaelan
