Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: one from the archives

[Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion]

> On Mar 24, 2024, at 12:21 PM, Katherina Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion 
> <agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> 
> On 24/03/2024 09:16, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:>     *
> Optionally, any other documents the Archivist deems worthy
>>      of archival.
> 
> hmm... the "Optionally" removes any obligation, but does mean that if
> there are any documents the Archivist deems worthy of archival (even
> non-Agoran documents!) but doesn't include, the option has not been
> taken and any documents the Archivist does include are not part of the
> report even if they may happen to be part of the same message
> 
> which I don't think affects anything because the report doesn't
> self-ratify but feels untidy
> 
> -Kate

Ah, yeah, good catch - starting to see the appeal of your suggested
wording (“chooses and deems…”)!

Probably worth patching afterwards, but not worth withdrawing the
proposal over?

Gaealn