On 6/18/25 04:02, Trigon via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 6/17/25 5:21 PM, Mischief via agora-discussion wrote:
>> On 6/17/25 12:25 PM, Trigon via agora-business wrote:
>>> Gratuitous for TRUE:
>>>
>>>  From rule 2651/1, "A player CAN initiate an election for a specified 
>>> elected office... [w]ith 2 support... provided that the initiator 
>>> becomes a candidate in the same message."
>>>
>>> Admittedly, there is some ambiguity here, but I argue that there is 
>>> one most sensible reading of this rule due to the way it is worded. 
>>> The tabled intent includes only initiating an election for an office. 
>>> Becoming a candidate is a separate action that must be taken in the 
>>> same message as an additional condition for completion of the tabled 
>>> intent. In this way, the identity of the "initiator" is not embedded 
>>> into the intent, it is determined at the time the tabled action 
>>> completes.
>>
>> That's a reasonable reading. I wonder, though, if that makes the 
>> original tabled intent invalid. An intent to do (X and Y) is not 
>> equivalent to an intent to do X. There are possible readings to make it 
>> okay in this case -- it is necessary to perform Y in conjunction with X 
>> for this method. Also, eir original wording could be construed as 
>> something like (an intent to do X) and then do Y
>>
>> That should give the judge something to ponder
> Given the ambiguous situation, I lay out the following plan. If this CFJ 
> is TRUE, then I am the Promotor as the four-day nomination period lapsed 
> with no other candidates about fourteen hours ago. If it is FALSE, I can 
> still publish the report via deputisation. If a judgement is delivered 
> before the end of the week, then I will respect the outcome of the 
> judgement. If not, I will conditionally deputise as the Promotor, 
> converging the gamestate enough that we at least have a distribution 
> this week.
>

The resolution of uncontested elections isn't automatic; it requires a
by announcement action. Promotor is currently unambiguously vacant.

-- 
Janet Cobb

Assessor, Rulekeepor

Reply via email to