On 5/13/26 09:36, M. Hamm via agora-business wrote: > On proposal 9344, I vote to ENDORSE the Absurdor. > > [It seems to me that, per rule 2127, if the Absurdor has not voted (or > it's indeterminate whether the Absurdor has voted), then the above > resolves to PRESENT, and I need to *change* it if I want to vote > otherwise. Therefore:] > > On proposal 9344, if the Absurdor has not voted, or if it's > indeterminate whether the Absurdor has voted, then I *change* my > earlier vote to vote FOR.
Note that the way this would work is that you've (1) cast a conditional ballot ["endorse Absurdor"], then (2) conditionally, immediately withdrawn that ballot and cast a FOR ballot. *Changing* your vote is evaluated immediately; if you want a conditional to be evaluated at the end of the voting period, it needs to be a conditional ballot (e.g. "On this decision, I cast a conditional ballot: if the Absurdor has voted, endorse em; otherwise, FOR"). -- Janet Cobb Assessor, Rulekeepor
