This distribution of proposals 5991-6003 initiates the Agoran
Decisions on whether to adopt them. The eligible voters for ordinary
proposals are the active players, the eligible voters for democratic
proposals are the active first-class players, and the vote collector
is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR, AGAINST,
and PRESENT.
NUM C I AI SUBMITTER TITLE
5991 D 1 2.0 Elysion Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It v2
5992 D 0 2.0 Bayes <none>
5993 D 0 3.0 Bayes <none>
5994 D 1 3.0 Murphy Loose ID numbers
5995 D 1 3.0 Murphy Fix multi-method dependent actions
5996 D 1 3.0 Warrigal Remove power-1 scams
5997 D 1 3.0 Sgeo Internment
5998 D 1 2.0 Sgeo Senator-only elections
5999 D 1 2.0 Sgeo Indefinite-length Emergencies
6000 D 1 2.0 Murphy Fix double jeopardy
6001 D 1 3.0 Goethe Pool Protection
6002 O 1 1.7 Murphy Refactor judicial timing
6003 D 0 2.0 Bayes <none>
chamber: O = Ordinary; D = Democratic
interest: 0-3 = interest index
Proposal ID numbers:
highest orderly: 6003
disorderly: none
Proposal pool: empty
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5991 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Elysion
Cantus Cygneus Only If You Mean It v2
Amend rule 1789 (Cantus Cygneus) by appending the following text to the
end of the last paragraph:
A player who has deregistered in a Writ of FAGE may not register
within thirty days of eir deregistration, other rules to the contrary
notwithstanding.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5992 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by Bayes
<none>
Repeal Rule 2188 (Win by Proposal).
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5993 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=0) by Bayes
<none>
Repeal Rule 1688 (Power).
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5994 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
Loose ID numbers
Amend Rule 2161 (ID Numbers) by replacing this text:
(b) Such an assignment is INVALID unless the number is a natural
number (expressed as a decimal literal with at most 14
digits) distinct from any ID number, and greater than any
orderly ID number, previously assigned to an entity of that
type. The player SHALL select the smallest number possible,
unless e reasonably believes that selecting any smaller
number might be invalid or confusing.
with this text:
(b) Such an assignment is INVALID unless the number is a natural
number (expressed as a decimal literal with at most 14
digits) distinct from any ID number previously assigned to
an entity of that type, and (if the type of entity is defined
by the rules as strictly ordered) greater than any orderly ID
number so assigned. The player SHOULD select the smallest
number possible.
Amend Rule 2141 (Role and Attributes of Rules) by replacing this text:
Rules have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Rulekeepor.
with this text:
Rules have ID numbers, to be assigned by the Rulekeepor, and are
strictly ordered.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5995 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
Fix multi-method dependent actions
Amend Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) by replacing this text:
at least one of the following methods
with this text:
a set of one or more of the following methods
and by replacing this text:
specifying the action and method (including the value of N)
with this text:
specifying the action and method(s) (including the value of
N for each method)
Amend Rule 2124 (Agoran Satisfaction) by replacing this text:
Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action
if and only if:
(1) the action is to be performed Without N Objections, and it
has fewer than N objectors;
(2) the action is to be performed With N supporters, and it has
N or more supporters; or
(3) the action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, and the
ratio of supporters to objectors is greater than N, or the
action has at least one supporter and no objectors.
with this text:
Agora is Satisfied with an intent to perform a specific action
if and only if:
(1) if the action is to be performed Without N Objections, then
it has fewer than N objectors;
(2) if the action is to be performed With N supporters, then it
has N or more supporters; and
(3) if the action is to be performed with N Agoran Consent, then
the ratio of supporters to objectors is greater than N, or
the action has at least one supporter and no objectors.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5996 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Warrigal
Remove power-1 scams
In rule 1728, "Dependent Actions", replace "A person (the performer)
CAN perform an action dependently" with "A rule allows a person (the
performer) to perform an action dependently", "The rules" with "The
rule", and "A dependent action CAN be performed non-dependently as
otherwise permitted by the rules." with "An action being defined as a
dependent action does not prevent it from being performed
non-dependently as otherwise permitted by the rules."
In rule 1769, "Holidays", after the sentence "A Holiday is a period of
time designated as such by the Rules.", add the sentence "Designating
a period of time as a Holiday is secured."
In rule 107, "Initiating Agoran Decisions", after paragraph (e), add
the paragraph "Defining information as an essential parameter for an
Agoran decision is secured, with power threshold equal to the power of
the rule authorizing its initiation."
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5997 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Sgeo, Goethe, Murphy
Internment
Create a rule with the following text
{
During an Emergency session, a non-Senator
may be placed in Internment by the Agoran Consent
of Senators.
Internment ends with the end of the Emergency Session. No
Senator is ever in Internment, and no player
is ever in internment outside of an Emergency Session.
Being in internment is secured.
When a Player is in Internment, e is not an eligible voter on
any Agoran Decision, including those that were in their
voting period when the player was placed in internment, rules
to the contrary notwithstanding.
}
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5998 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Sgeo
Senator-only elections
Amend Rule 2154 to read
{
Any player CAN by announcement initiate an election for an
elected office for which no election is already in progress,
nominating at least one active player.
During the first four days of the election (the nomination
period), any player CAN by announcement nominate one or more
active players.
As soon as possible after the nomination period ends, the IADoP
SHALL initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new
officeholder. For this decision:
1) The valid options (hereafter the candidates) are the active
players who, during the election,
a) received and accepted a nomination for the office
before the decision was initiated (self-nomination
constitutes acceptance), and
b) did not decline a nomination for the office, and
c) are Senators if there is currently an Emergency Session.
The set of candidates can change after the decision is
initiated.
2) If there is no Emergency Session at the time the decision is
initiated, the eligible voters are the active players. Otherwise, the
eligible voters are the active Senators.
3) Each eligible voter's voting limit is one. An ordered list
of multiple choices constitutes a conditional vote for the
first choice if it could be the outcome, otherwise the
second choice if it could be the outcome, and so forth.
Upon the resolution of this decision, its outcome (if a
candidate) is installed into the office, and the election ends.
}
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 5999 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Sgeo
Indefinite-length Emergencies
Amend Rule 2177 by removing the sentence
"An unterminated emergency session terminates 21 days after it was called."
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 6000 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Murphy
Fix double jeopardy
Amend Rule 1504 (Criminal Cases) by replacing this text:
* ALREADY TRIED, appropriate if judgement has already been
reached in another criminal case with the same defendant, the
same rule, and substantially the same alleged act
with this text:
* ALREADY TRIED, appropriate if judgement (other than ALREADY
TRIED) has already been reached in another criminal case with
the same defendant, the same rule, and substantially the same
alleged act
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 6001 (Democratic, AI=3.0, Interest=1) by Goethe
Pool Protection
Amend Rule 106 by inserting the following text after the second
paragraph:
A player specifically permitted by the Rules to distribute
a Proposal CAN distribute the proposal by publishing it
with the clear intent of distributing it. When a proposal is
distributed, it is removed from the Proposal Pool. The
distribution of a proposal initiates the Agoran decision of
whether to adopt the proposal, as described elsewhere.
Removing a proposal from the Pool by a means other than
initiating an Agoran Decision to adopt it is secured.
If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least one current
active player to distribute a Proposal, than any player may
do so Without 3 Objections.
Amend Rule 1607 by deleting the third paragraph.
Amend Rule 1607 by replacing 'MAY' with 'CAN and MAY'.
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 6002 (Ordinary, AI=1.7, Interest=1) by Murphy
Refactor judicial timing
Amend Rule 591 (Inquiry Cases) by replacing this text:
An inquiry case has a judicial question on veracity, which is
always applicable. The valid judgements for this question are:
* FALSE, appropriate if the statement was factually and
logically false at the time the inquiry case was initiated
* TRUE, appropriate if the statement was factually and logically
true at the time the inquiry case was initiated
* UNDECIDABLE, appropriate if the statement was logically
undecidable or otherwise not capable of being accurately
described as either false or true, at the time the inquiry
case was initiated
* IRRELEVANT, appropriate if the veracity of the statement at
the time the inquiry case was initiated is not relevant to the
game
with this text:
An inquiry case has a judicial question on veracity, which is
always applicable. The valid judgements for this question are
as follows, based on the truth or falsity of the statement at
the time the inquiry case was initiated:
* FALSE, appropriate if the statement was factually and
logically false
* TRUE, appropriate if the statement was factually and logically
true
* UNDECIDABLE, appropriate if the statement was logically
undecidable or otherwise not capable of being accurately
described as either false or true
* IRRELEVANT, appropriate if the veracity of the statement is not
relevant to the game
Amend Rule 911 (Appeal Cases) by replacing this text:
An appeal case has a judicial question on disposition, which is
applicable if and only if the prior question is applicable. The
valid judgements for the question on disposition, and their
effects, are as follows:
with this text:
An appeal case has a judicial question on disposition, which is
applicable if and only if the prior question is applicable. The
valid judgements for the question on disposition, and their
effects, are as follows, based on the appropriateness of the
prior judgement at the time it was delivered:
}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
Proposal 6003 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=0) by Bayes
<none>
Repeal Rule 2222 (Maximum Voting Limits).
