Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2580
============================== CFJ 2580 ==============================
On or about Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:02:15 -0700, Rodlen initiated an
inquiry case on the statement "What is forced by rule 2029 to
Dance a Powerful Dance?".
========================================================================
Caller: Murphy
Barred: Rodlen
Judge: BobTHJ
Judgement: FALSE
========================================================================
History:
Called by Murphy: 12 Jun 2009 14:40:37 GMT
Assigned to BobTHJ: 12 Jun 2009 14:51:15 GMT
Judged FALSE by BobTHJ: 23 Jun 2009 16:12:46 GMT
========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
ais523 wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 07:23 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Rodlen wrote:
>>
>>> I CFJ on the following:
>>> "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?"
>> Ineffective, neither a statement nor a yes/no question.
>
> Shouldn't it be judged MALFORMED, then? Or can the CotC catch those
> before they're assigned?
"It should. No." is implied by Rule 591, but not stated explicitly.
========================================================================
Judge BobTHJ's Arguments:
R591 seems to reasonably imply that a CFJ must either be called on a
statement whose truthfulness can be evaluated, or a question which can
be answered with a yes or no. Therefore I rule FALSE.
========================================================================
