Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2763
=================== CFJ 2763 (Interest Index = 0) ====================
In an AI 4 proposal, "Change gamestate value X from 'Y' to 'Z'"
has the same meaning as "If gamestate value X is currently 'Y',
change it to 'Z'".
========================================================================
Caller: ais523
Judge: coppro
Judgement:
========================================================================
History:
Called by ais523: 20 Feb 2010 17:15:14 GMT
Assigned to coppro: (as of this message)
========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
We've been playing as if this were true. However, an AI 4
proposal is powerful enough to create a legal fiction that the old value
of gamestate value X was in fact Y, and this seems to be the literal
meaning of what was written. Where does the convention that changes fail
if the old value was specified incorrectly come from?
========================================================================
