Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2778
=================== CFJ 2778 (Interest Index = 0) ====================
coppro has voted on the decision to adopt Proposal 6686.
========================================================================
Caller: Murphy
Barred: coppro
Judge: Yally
Judgement:
========================================================================
History:
Called by Murphy: 22 Mar 2010 10:41:43 GMT
Assigned to Yally: (as of this message)
========================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
"Changing" a vote is defined by Rule 683 (d);
if there's no previous ballot, then does the whole thing break?
========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
coppro wrote:
> On 03/21/2010 06:03 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> This distribution of proposals and the subsequent assigning of ID
>> numbers initiates the Agoran Decisions on whether to adopt proposals
>> 6686-6694. The eligible voters for these proposals are the active
>> players as of this message; their voting limits are defined by Rules
>> 1950 or 2156 and 2279, as appropriate. The vote collector for these
>> Decisions is the Assessor. The valid options on each decision are FOR
>> and AGAINST (voters may also be PRESENT). These decisions are all
>> ordinary to begin with.
>>
>> NUM II AI SUBMITTER CHAMBER TITLE
>> 6686 1 2.0 coppro Purple Cleanup in Aisle 2156
>> 6687 0 3.0 coppro Purple Singularize
>> 6688 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
>> 6689 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
>> 6690 1 1.0 comex Purple Proposal
>> 6691 1 2.0 coppro Purple Fun While They Lasted
>> 6692 1 2.0 coppro Purple We Have No Protectorates
>> 6693 0 1.5 coppro Purple Hawk Cleanup
>> 6694 1 1.7 comex Purple Prejudice
>
> I change my vote to FOR all ongoing Decisions to adopt proposals.
========================================================================