On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:42 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 6:39 PM Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 2017-08-13 at 20:15 -0500, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
> > > CoE grok is a player
> > 
> > If only we could set up a standing order for this or something.
> > The Referee should perhaps at least start giving out cards; a
> > mistake
> > in a report is excusable, making it that many times in a row isn't.
> 
> I point my finger at P.S.S. for violations of Rule 2143, which states
> that: "A person SHALL NOT publish information that is inaccurate or
> misleading while performing an official duty, or within a document
> purporting to be part of any person or office's weekly or monthly
> report." I recommend a sentence of yellow card. These errors, while
> independently insignificant, together have a "a significant, though
> small, impact on gameplay" (Rule 2427), if nothing else because
> they're an annoying distraction.
> 
> I AP-CFJ "The most recent document, published to agora-official, and
> purporting to be the Registrar's report, was not in fact a report."

This is CFJ 3552. I assign it to omd.

> Caller's arguments: CFJ 2392 makes it clear that deliberately
> inaccurate reports are not reports. CFJ 3462 (which I judged)
> extended
> this to apply to reports that "exhibit gross sloppiness and
> negligence, equivalent in severity to lying in the report or not
> publishing it." That's a rather high bar to meet, but I believe this
> situation qualifies. Here, repeated CoEs and a-d discussion, some of
> which involved P.S.S. emself, have discussed the situation. It is
> matter well supported by the public record that this error has
> occurred numerous times (see for example [1], [2]). Under
> circumstances, I believe the CFJ 3462 standard is met. To be clear,
> this CFJ raises a Rule 2201 doubt regarding the report.
> 
> I CoE P.S.S.'s attempt to claim a reward for the report on the basis
> that there was no report.
> 
> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg290
> 24.html
> [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg289
> 18.html

-- 
ais523
Arbitor

Reply via email to