Well, if the resolution message actually is self-ratifying, I see no reason why the following shouldn't work, assuming this message actually is received by a "reasonable number" of people. (So please confirm receipt!)
--- On July 19, 2018 3:09 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Claim of error on resolutions of 8059, 8064, and 8065: > > twg's vote as follows also fails. > > "If the votes on proposal XXXX at the end of its voting period are > > such that it has been or will be ADOPTED, then FOR; otherwise > > AGAINST." evaluates to AGAINST. (twg) > > Reason: voting strength can change after the end of the voting period, > so even at the end you can't know if it "will be adopted" until it is > Assessed. The only correct phrasing I can think of is "If the decision > was assessed exactly at the end of the voting period and the result if > assessed at that moment would be X, then Y, else Z". On July 19, 2018 7:57 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > However, I do have a couple more CoEs to submit: > > Firstly, my zombie is Kenyon, actually; Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > is o's master. See: > <https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32186.html>. > I don't believe this changes the outcome of any proposal, but I want to > avoid any possible weirdness that might come of self-ratification. > > Secondly, I voted (unconditionally) AGAINST proposal 8063: > <https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg32295.html>. > Again, this doesn't change the outcome of the proposal, but I'm a little > concerned about the possibility that other people's votes might also have > been miscounted, which very well could. For each of the 3 above-quoted CoEs: If it has not been claimed against the document(s) in which the Assessor resolved Proposals 8058-8065, I claim it against said document(s). I deputise for the Assessor to accept the 3 above-quoted CoEs and publish the following revision. (No overall results have changed from the original resolution.) --- 8058, AI-1.0 (Medal of Honour Auctions, by V.J. Rada) FOR: V.J. Rada, Ouri, Corona, 天火狐 AGAINST: PSS, o, Aris, twg, Kenyon[1], Murphy PRESENT: G., Trigon, Quazie, ATMunn, nichdel, CuddleBeam F/A: 5/6 RESULT: REJECTED 8059, AI-1.0 (honour is its own reward, by G.) FOR: PSS, o, G., Aris, ATMunn, nichdel AGAINST: V.J. Rada, Ouri, Corona, 天火狐 PRESENT: Trigon, Quazie, CuddleBeam, Murphy, twg[2], Kenyon[1] F/A: 6/4 RESULT: ADOPTED 8060, AI-1.8 (Notary-B-Gone, by V.J. Rada) FOR: PSS, o, G., Aris, V.J. Rada, Ouri, ATMunn, nichdel, Corona, 天火狐, twg, Kenyon[1], Murphy AGAINST: PRESENT: Trigon, Quazie, CuddleBeam F/A: 13/0 RESULT: ADOPTED 8061, AI-1.0 (Free Proposals, by Aris) FOR: PSS, o, Aris, Trigon, Quazie, ATMunn, nichdel, twg, Kenyon[1] AGAINST: G., Telnaior, V.J. Rada, Ouri PRESENT: Corona, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, Murphy F/A: 9/4 RESULT: ADOPTED 8062, AI-3.0 (The End of the World, Again, by Trigon) FOR: PSS, o, Aris, Trigon, Quazie, CuddleBeam AGAINST: G., Telnaior, V.J. Rada, Ouri, Corona, 天火狐, twg, Kenyon[1] PRESENT: ATMunn, nichdel, Murphy F/A: 6/8 RESULT: REJECTED 8063, AI-2.0 (IAR Writs Repeal, by V.J. Rada) FOR: G., V.J. Rada, Ouri, Corona, 天火狐 AGAINST: Aris, PSS, o PRESENT: Trigon, Quazie, ATMunn, nichdel, CuddleBeam, twg, Kenyon[1], Murphy F/A: 5/3 RESULT: REJECTED 8064, AI-1.0 (Land Grants, by G.) FOR: G., ATMunn, nichdel, Murphy AGAINST: V.J. Rada, Ouri PRESENT: Corona, 天火狐, CuddleBeam, PSS[3], o[3], Aris[4], Trigon[5], Quazie[5], twg[6], Kenyon[1] F/A: 4/2 RESULT: ADOPTED 8065, AI-2.0 (No undead courts, by twg) FOR: G., ATMunn, nichdel, Corona, 天火狐, Murphy AGAINST: PRESENT: V.J. Rada, Ouri, CuddleBeam, PSS[3], o[3], Aris[4], Trigon[5], Quazie[5], twg[6], Kenyon[1] F/A: 6/0 RESULT: ADOPTED [1] Endorsing twg. (Kenyon) [2] "If the votes on proposal 8058 at the end of its voting period are such that it has been or will be ADOPTED, then FOR; otherwise AGAINST." was intractable at the end of the voting period, evaluates to PRESENT. (twg) [3] "Conditional: AGAINST, unless 8062 was REJECTED, in which case, FOR" was intractable at the end of the voting period, evaluates to PRESENT. (PSS, o) [4] "If P8062 is REJECTED, FOR; otherwise AGAINST." was intractable at the end of the voting period, evaluates to PRESENT. (Aris). [5] "If 8062 passes, AGAINST. Otherwise FOR." was intractable at the end of the voting period, evaluates to PRESENT (Trigon, Quazie). [6] "If the votes on proposal 8062 at the end of its voting period are such that it has been or will be ADOPTED, then AGAINST; otherwise FOR." was intractable at the end of the voting period, evaluates to PRESENT. (twg) --- -twg
