I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 6, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes).
ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8133 Trigon 1.0 Proposals aren't worth *that* much 8134 G. 2.0 The judge switch 8135 twg, D Margaux 2.0 Blot Decay (Reprise) 8136 V.J. Rada 3.0 I hate myself 8137 Aris, twg, Trigon 3.0 Uncorrecting Rewards 8138 twg 2.5 Access to contracts' assets The proposal pool is currently empty. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8133 Title: Proposals aren't worth *that* much Adoption index: 1.0 Author: Trigon Co-authors: Amend rule 2496 by replacing the text "the total strength of all valid ballots", wherever it appears, to "the number of valid ballots". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8134 Title: The judge switch Adoption index: 2.0 Author: G. Co-authors: Amend R991 (Calls for Judgement) by replacing the paragraph beginning "When a CFJ has no judge assigned" with the following text: Judge is an untracked CFJ switch with possible values of any person or "unassigned" (default). To "assign" a CFJ to a person is to flip that CFJ's judge to that person. To "remove" or "recuse" a person from a being the judge of a CFJ is to flip that CFJ's judge from that person to unassigned. When a CFJ's judge is unassigned, the Arbitor CAN assign any eligible player to be its judge by announcement, and SHALL do so in a timely fashion. The players eligible to be assigned as judge are all active players except the initiator and the person barred (if any). The Arbitor SHALL assign judges over time such that all interested players have reasonably equal opportunities to judge. If a CFJ has no judge assigned, then any player eligible to judge that CFJ CAN assign it to emself Without 3 Objections. [I think all instances of judge assignment/removal work with the above definitions, without further modification]. For every CFJ that was assigned to a judge immediately before this proposal took effect, that CFJ's judge switch is flipped to that judge. [Note: all old cases - however old - are still considered to have their last-assigned judge (judges are not "removed" when a case is closed). This is true both before and after this proposal]. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8135 Title: Blot Decay (Reprise) Adoption index: 2.0 Author: twg Co-authors: D Margaux Amend Rule 2555 to replace: “If a player has neither gained blots nor expunged any blots from emself in the current Agoran week, e CAN expunge 1 blot from emself by announcement.” With: “At the end of each Agoran week, 1 blot is automatically expunged from each impure player who that week had not gained any blots.” ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8136 Title: I hate myself Adoption index: 3.0 Author: V.J. Rada Co-authors: Rules or Instruments to the contrary notwithstanding, this proposal shall act as though its text is the text submitted to a public forum and clearly marked "Memes submission" by the last person to vote FOR it. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8137 Title: Uncorrecting Rewards Adoption index: 3.0 Author: Aris Co-authors: twg, Trigon [ This is A.I. 3.0 because I don't know what Rule 2496's power is. Proposal 8127 "reenacted" it, meaning it acquires the power it had when it was originally repealed, but I wasn't around when that happened and it's not in the SLR yet. ] Amend rule 2496 by replacing all instances of the text "create in eir possession" with the word "earn". ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8138 Title: Access to contracts' assets Adoption index: 2.5 Author: twg Co-authors: [ Been floating around in my mind since G. and D. Margaux pulled off the "First Bank of Agora" scam, which frankly deserved to work first time. This proposal allows contract parties to manipulate the contract's assets as permitted by the contract, and also tidies up the verbiage a little bit. ] Amend Rule 1742, "Contracts", by replacing the last paragraph with the following: A party to a contract CAN perform any of the following actions as permitted by the contract's text: * Act on behalf of another party to the contract. * Destroy destructible assets in the contract's possession. * Transfer liquid assets in the contract's possession. //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
