The below CFJ is 3828. I assign it to Alexis.
status: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/#3828
=============================== CFJ 3828 ===============================
A recent rule named "A coin award" was enacted, increased the
number of coins R. Lee owns by 1, and then repealed itself.
==========================================================================
Caller: R. Lee
Judge: Alexis
==========================================================================
History:
Called by R. Lee: 09 Apr 2020 01:02:40
Assigned to Alexis: [now]
==========================================================================
Caller's Evidence:
Here is the text of the rule. The current SLR doesn't list it (i assume
the author of the SLR thought it repealed itself), so the rule doesn't
have a number.
" When this rule is enacted, a player other than the
author of the proposal which enacted this rule earns 1
coin. Then, if a player earned a coin this way, this
rule repeals itself. "
Here is the text of the proposal that enacted the said rule, numbered
8363, AI 1, author Warrigal
"Enact a power-1 rule titled "A Coin Award":
{
When this rule is enacted, a player other than the
author of the proposal which enacted this rule earns 1
coin. Then, if a player earned a coin this way, this
rule repeals itself.
} "
Caller's Arguments:
The rule clearly gives a player other than warrigal one coin. A is clearly
singular in this context. Rules should be carried out when they can so
this rule should be given effect. R. Lee is a player. If this CFJ were
judged TRUE and R. Lee were held to be given the coin, the rule would be
satisfied. There is no other way to distinguish who, specifically, has the
coin, so why not give it to R. Lee?
==========================================================================
