PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/124Y-zHgpsOO5hhkjm8XNjM2hLzRW3TtE2W5Ml-kkcuE/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8851* 4st 3.0 Voter Protection 8852~ 4st, Jason 2.0 Fix infractions 8853* Jason 3.0 Unfortunately 8854* Jason 3.0 Attainder 8855~ Jason 1.0 Extermination v1.1 8856~ 4st 2.0 Backup Justice The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Currently empty. Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8851 Title: Voter Protection Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: 4st Co-author(s): Set 4st's score to half its current value, rounded down. If 4st doesn't already have the patent title "Bully", grant em the patent title "Bully". Destroy half of 4st's coins, rounded down. Decrease 4st's Karma by 1. Create the following rule, with Title "Voter Protection" and power=3.0 { Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, proposals cannot affect players' assets or players' scores based on the way they have voted. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, rules that affect players' assets or players' scores based on the way a player has voted cannot affect the proposal in which that rule is enacted. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, proposals cannot grant patent titles to players based on the way they have voted. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8852 Title: Fix infractions Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: 4st Co-Author(s): Jason Amend rule 2555 "Blots" by replacing the following sentence: "Destroying blots is secured with a Power Threshold of 1.7." with "Creating and destroying blots is secured with a Power Threshold of 1.7" ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8853 Title: Unfortunately Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Jason Co-Author(s): Amend Rule 869 by appending the following paragraphs: { Banned is a secured negative boolean person switch tracked by the Registrar. A person is unwelcome if e is Banned or if at least one part of em is unwelcome. Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, an unwelcome person CANNOT register or be registered, and e is immediately deregistered if e is ever a player. Designations of unwelcomeness are secured. Unwelcomeness is to be used only to make a social statement that the Agoran community no longer wishes to interact with certain persons; in particular, it is not to be used to acquire gameplay advantage. As such, an unwelcome person SHOULD NOT, under any circumstances, attempt to bypass unwelcomeness, and e SHOULD carefully consider the circumstances of eir becoming unwelcome before participating in public or discussion fora. } ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8854 Title: Attainder Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Jason Co-Author(s): For the purposes of this proposal, "Madrid" is the person who, at the time of this proposal's submission, was a player and who was known as "Madrid" to the average Agoran. Madrid is hereby deregistered. Madrid's instance of the Banned switch is hereby flipped to true. [ This is a bill of attainder. Its purpose is to deregister and, if possible, ban Madrid as a sanction for a series of incidents on the lists and on the unofficial Discord server. This is not in response to any single incident, but rather a pattern of behavior. This is additionally not in response to Madrid's distaste for Spivak pronouns itself, regardless of the timing of this submission. Madrid's actions and views have resulted in two deregistrations (one successful FAGE and one attempted FAGE that wasn't a FAGE due to a technicality), hostile exchanges of words on list, and an atmosphere on the Discord that discourages participation in discussion. No other single player's non-gameplay actions and expressions of views have resulting in similar responses from other players. This proposal is phrased in such a way that, if adopted, Madrid will be unconditionally deregisted and will be Banned if the associated proposal "Unfortunately" has been adopted. Even if "Unfortunately" has not been adopted, the adoption of this proposal represents the AI-3 consensus that Madrid is not welcome. If this occurs, and "Unfortunately" failed due to a technical reason rather than apparent rejection of the idea, the author will pursue further proposals to officialize the ban. ] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8855 Title: Extermination v1.1 Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Jason Co-Author(s): Repeal each of the following rules, in ascending numerical order by ID: * Rule 2660 (Birds) * Rule 2661 (Permits) * Rule 2662 (Playing with Birds) * Rule 2663 (Bird Migration) * Rule 2664 (One with Nature) * Rule 2665 (The Birds) ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 8856 Title: Backup Justice Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: 4st Co-Author(s): Grant Madrid 200 blots. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- secretsnail
