PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For each decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 3, the voting method is AI-majority, the adoption index is the adoption index of the associated proposal, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9153* Murphy, Janet 3.0 No double harvest 9154~ Murphy, Mischief 2.0 Pragmatic quarters, take two 9155~ Murphy, Mischief 2.0 Some stones are more equal than others The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9153 Title: No double harvest Adoption Index: 3.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Janet Amend Rule 2124 (Performing Tabled Actions) by replacing this text: An intent is ripe if was tabled within the past 14 days, the Speaker hasn't objected to it in the past 48 hours, and its conditions, if any, are each clearly and unambiguously met. with this text: An intent is ripe if was tabled within the past 14 days, the Speaker hasn't objected to it in the past 48 hours, its conditions (if any) are each clearly and unambiguously met, and no one has already acted as allowed based on that intent. [Prevent reusing intents even if they're less than two weeks old. If we spot a use case where we agree they should be reusable, then we can define an exception mechanism.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9154 Title: Pragmatic quarters, take two Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Mischief Amend Rule 2555 (Blots) by replacing this text: At the beginning of each quarter, half (rounded down) of each fugitive's blots are destroyed. with this text: Once a quarter, the Referee CAN (and SHALL during its first Eastman week) publish a Notice of Clemency, upon which half (rounded down) of each fugitive's blots are destroyed. Amend Rule 2685 (Crystals) by replacing this text: At the beginning of each quarter, each crystal whose identity is not equal to the ID of any rule in the current ruleset has its size increased by 3. with this text: Once a quarter, the Geologist CAN (and SHALL during its first Eastman week) publish a Notice of Crystal Growth, upon which each crystal whose identity is not equal to the ID of any rule in the current ruleset has its size increased by 3. Amend Rule 2656 (Radiance) by replacing this text: At the start of every quarter, all radiance switches are set to half their current value rounded down. with this text: Once a quarter, the Illuminator CAN (and SHALL during its first Eastman week) publish a Notice of Diminution, upon which all radiance switches are set to half their current value rounded down. [Same as before, except the officer is required to do it within the first seven days of the quarter. If e's late, then the timing still differs, but that may still be better than a platonic event occurring but potentially being overlooked.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9155 Title: Some stones are more equal than others Adoption Index: 2.0 Author: Murphy Co-authors: Mischief Amend Rule 2644 (Zen Gardening) by replacing this text: A player has an impressive rock collection if e: 1) owns 10 or more stones; or 2) owns 8 or more stones and does not own the Tacky Stone. with this text: A player has an impressive rock collection if e owns one or more stones with a total Stature of at least 8. The Stature of each stone is 1, unless its definition specifies otherwise. Amend Rule 2645 (The Stones) by replacing this text: - Tacky Stone (monthly): with this text: - Tacky Stone (monthly, Stature -1): [Generalizes the "Tacky Stone is beyond worthless" mechanism, in case we want to bump the Stature of any other stones up or down. No effect if Tacky Stone wasn't adopted.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- snail
