PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW If you vote on a proposal, please edit this spreadsheet with your votes:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F39OHtBlZlQ8XVccqKCFtP-DPuHz4wPnujxbxkCN3LI/edit?usp=sharing I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, and removing it from the proposal pool. For each decision, the vote collector is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, the adoption index is the adoption index of the associated proposal, and the valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are conditional votes). ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9184* ais523 3.2 Ratification fix 9185~ Janet 1.0 Gun control The proposal pool contains the following proposals: ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal. <ID>~ : Ordinary proposal. The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where the information shown below differs from the information shown above, the information shown above shall control. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9184 Title: Ratification fix Adoption Index: 3.2 Author: ais523 Co-authors: Amend rule 1551 by changing {{{ * The publication time is the instant at which the document to be ratified was published. }}} to {{{ * The publication time can be specified by the instrument allowing the ratification, defaulting to the instant at which the document to be ratified was published. }}} Amend rule 2201 by changing {{{ - If the rules define it as a self-ratifying attestation to a given statement, the statement is ratified. }}} to {{{ - If the rules define it as a self-ratifying attestation to a given statement, the statement is ratified, with the publication time being the instant at which the document was published. }}} [This has been broken for a while, and was observed to be broken a while ago: self-ratifying attestations, such as proposal results, currently don't usually self-ratify because the definition of the publication time doesn't work for them unless the statement being attested to is explicitly published. If this proposal is adopted, I encourage the Assessor to explicitly publish the statement being attested to as part of the resolution message, in order to ensure that those results self-ratify.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// ID: 9185 Title: Gun control Adoption Index: 1.0 Author: Janet Co-authors: Amend Rule 2692 ("Bang!") by replacing "When a player stands alone, e wins the game. If a player won the game in this manner 4 days ago, then the match state is flipped to none (if it is not already)." with the following: "When a player stands alone, eir radiance is increased by 30, then the match state is flipped to none (if it is not already).". [A full win for this relatively fast (even after the changes) subgame has always seemed like a lot to me.] ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// -- snail (Alive, 0 Bangs) Steampunk Hat
