=================
PROMOTOR'S REPORT
=================
I initiate a referendum on each of the following proposals, removing
them from the proposal pool. For each referendum the vote collector is the
Assessor, the quorum is 6, the adoption index is that of the associated
proposal, the voting method is AI-majority, and the valid options are FOR
and AGAINST. (PRESENT and conditional votes are also both valid votes.)
ID Author AI Name
-----------------------------------------------------------------
9277* 4st+ 3.0 Bring Back Yellow
9278* 4st+ 3.0 Bring Back Science (fixing the
oops)
9279~ ais523 2.0 Less confusing Speaker
nomination
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal pool contains the following proposals (self-ratifying):
Author AI Name
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Legend:
NNNN*: Democratic proposal
NNNN~: Ordinary proposal
NAME+: Coauthors listed below
The full text of all above mentioned proposal(s) is listed below. Where
the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
the information shown above shall control.
==========
ID 9277
Bring Back Yellow (AI=3.0)
author: 4st
coauthors: snail, Trigon, ais523, Janet
[persuasion: Instead of inserting subgames into the rules... we have
been inserting subgames directly into the rules, and creating the
"contests" rule.]
Amend Rule 2348 ("Ribbons") by appending another paragraph after the
one starting with "Orange (O):" with the text:
{
Yellow (Y): When a tournament that a player was a gamemaster of ends
with a winner, that gamemaster earns a Yellow Ribbon.
}
==========
ID 9278
Bring Back Science (fixing the oops) (AI=3.0)
author: 4st
coauthors: snail, Trigon, ais523, Janet
Amend Rule 2348 ("Ribbons") by appending another paragraph after the
one starting with "Orange (O):" with the text:
{
Infrared (D): When a player earns an Indigo Ribbon, that player CAN,
once by announcement, grant any other person an Infrared Ribbon.
}
==========
ID 9279
Less confusing Speaker nomination (AI=2.0)
author: ais523
coauthors:
In rule 103, delete
{{{
If at any time the office of Speaker is
vacant, or when one or more players win Agora, then the Prime
Minister CAN once appoint a Laureled player to the office of
Speaker by announcement.
}}}
and, as a new paragraph immediately after the location from which that
text was deleted, add
{{{
The Prime Minister CAN by announcement appoint a Laureled player to the
office of Speaker if either of the following conditions apply:
a) the office of Speaker is vacant; or
b) the same person has been Speaker continuously since a player most
recently won Agora.
}}}
[The existing rule is unclear about when the win-created ability to
appoint a Speaker ends. For example, suppose a player wins twice in the
same message: under the existing rules that may create an obligation to
reinstall em as Speaker the next time a new Speaker is nominated for
non-win reasons, because only one of the two appointment permissions
was discharged at the time of eir original appointment.]
--
Cosmo
Promotor
