RESOLUTION OF PROPOSALS 9367-9370
=================================
ID Title Result
---------------------------------------------------------
9367 Divestment ADOPTED
9369 Oops ADOPTED
9370 Probably shouldn't leave this lying around ADOPTED
I hereby resolve the Agoran decisions to adopt the below proposals.
The quorum for all below decisions was 7.
VOTING STRENGTHS
================
Strength is 3 unless otherwise noted.
#: player has voting strength 3
$: player has voting strength 4
%: player has voting strength 5
^: player has voting strength 6
PROPOSALS
=========
PROPOSAL 9367 (Divestment)
AUTHOR: Kate
CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
FOR (5): Galle, Janet, Mischief, ais523, snail
AGAINST (1): 4st
PRESENT (4): Cosmo, Murphy, juan, pizza723
BALLOTS: 10
AI (F/A): 15/3 (AI=3.0)
POPULARITY: 0.400
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
Murphy: Endorsement of non-voter Kate: Inextricable
juan: Endorsement of non-voter Kate: Inextricable
]
PROPOSAL 9369 (Oops)
AUTHOR: snail
CLASS: DEMOCRATIC
FOR (8): Galle, Janet, Mischief, ais523, juan, msh210, pizza723, snail
AGAINST (0):
PRESENT (2): Cosmo, Murphy
BALLOTS: 10
AI (F/A): 24/0 (AI=3.0)
POPULARITY: 0.800
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
Cosmo: Trigon is the Numerator: Endorsement of non-voter Trigon: Inextricable
Janet: Endorsement of ais523
Murphy: Trigon is the Numerator: Endorsement of non-voter Trigon: Inextricable
]
PROPOSAL 9370 (Probably shouldn't leave this lying around)
AUTHOR: Galle
CLASS: ORDINARY
FOR (10): Cosmo^, Galle, Janet^, Mischief^, Murphy^, ais523%, juan%, msh210,
pizza723%, snail%
AGAINST (1): 4st
PRESENT (0):
BALLOTS: 11
AI (F/A): 50/3 (AI=2.0)
POPULARITY: 0.818
OUTCOME: ADOPTED
[
Janet: Endorsement of ais523
]
The full text of each ADOPTED proposal is included below:
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9367
Title: Divestment
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: Kate
Co-authors:
Set the Indigo Ribbon Ownership of the author of this proposal to False.
[Many, many years ago, I acquired an Indigo Ribbon through a scam,
without realising this was considered Poor Form, and later used it in a
Win by Renaissance. Since then I have desperately been trying to
account for it by achieving degrees and declining to award myself the
ribbon, but people keep "helpfully" awarding it to me anyway to allow
for my "forgetfulness".
This just happened again and I do not want to go through yet another
round of this. Can we fix it by proposal, please?]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9369
Title: Oops
Adoption index: 3.0
Author: snail
Co-authors: Mischief
Amend Rule 2713 (Scoring Numbers) by replacing the text:
{
Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the
Numerator CAN once, and SHALL in a timely fashion, grant that
player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a
proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a
referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in
that number, whose type is that digit.
}
with the text:
{
Whenever a player scores a number as described in this rule, the
Numerator CAN once by announcement, and SHALL in a timely fashion,
grant that
player (and, if the number was scored due to the adoption of a
proposal, also a randomly chosen other player who voted FOR on a
referendum to adopt that proposal) a number card for each digit in
that number, whose type is that digit.
}
The following statement is hereby ratified:
{
Each attempt to grant a player a number card that occured prior to the
adoption of this proposal took effect as if the text "CAN once," in Rule
2713 instead read "CAN once by announcement,".
}
[This should work for each version of Rule 2713 that has existed. I'm doing
this instead of changing the past text of the rule because doing that
retroactively would have caused proposals that amended that specific text
to fail.]
[I also considered expunging the Numerator's duties to avoid shenanigans,
but that might do more harm than good, and the ratification should already
cover that issue.]
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
ID: 9370
Title: Probably shouldn't leave this lying around
Adoption index: 2.0
Author: Galle
Co-authors:
Repeal the rule entitled "Purchased Re-enactment".
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
