ais523 wrote: > Some scams work better when they're kept secret; however, some are > better when people know they're scams in advance. This message contains > at least 3 scam attempts; some I think are unlikely to work, some I > think are considerably more likely. (Further hints: at least one depends > on the newly-amended wording of rule 2124; exactly one depends on the > mysterious proposal 6455.)
Given that 6455, 6461, 6470, and 6471 (in the unlikely case that it's a proposal at all) all failed, I don't know what you're on about. > For each public contract (see the list at > <http://agora-notary.wikidot.com/system:page-tags/tag/public>), I > intend, without objection; I intend, without member objection; and I > intend, without 3 objections; to replace its entire text with the > following: Note that, while AFAIK my objections to the without-objection intents and without-3-objections intents are valid, my objections to the without-member-objection intents are only valid for the contracts of which I am a member. Members of other contracts are advised to defend themselves against this mousetrap accordingly. _______________________________________________ Agora mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
