On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:58 PM, comex <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Tanner Swett <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 2:25 PM, omd <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Rules regarding past events and game values pertain to the >>>> actual platonic state of the game in the past, not to an archive >>>> implicitly stored in the gamestate. >> Perhaps "record" instead of "archive"? > > Sure, I retract and re-propose as specified.
Incidentally, opinions on whether I should CFJ about whether or not this results in "an record", or avoid wasting the court's time by just writing it out in full? ;p _______________________________________________ Agora mailing list [email protected] http://listserver.tue.nl/mailman/listinfo/agora
