One should be careful about referring to   A- g(h) as a pseudo covariance, this might 
be taken to imply that it has some properties like a covariance such as positive 
definiteness. Pierre's comment is relevant to
the question of solving the ordinary kriging equations rather than to any covariance 
like properties of A-g(h). If one visualizes the coefficient matrix of the ordinary 
kriging equations in 3-D  (rows and columns
are in the plane, entries in the matrix are the heights) then using the variogram the 
initial form has zeros down the diagonal, i.e., the shape is much like a valley. Now 
visualize the matrix in "solved" form, all
diagonal entries will be 1's and all off diagonal entries are zeros. Hence in an 
intuitive sense the initial form is quite different from the desired end result. In 
constrast if the ordinary kriging equations are
written in terms of the covariance function then the shape is more like a ridge down 
the diagonal, this change corresponds to several simple algebraic operations. Multiply 
both sides of all equations except the last
equation (the unbiasedness condition,  "nonbias" is not an English word, it is 
French), then add the constant A to both sides of all equations except the last. 
Because of the unbiasedness condition, i.e., the last
equation, "A" on the left side can be written as A times the sum of the kriging 
weights. Then a slight re-grouping makes the  "-g(h)" terms all appear to be of the 
form  A-g(h). This does not ensure that the system
has a unique solution, it is the conditional negative definiteness of the variogram.  
If  g(h) is conditionally negative definite then  -g(h) is conditionally positive 
definite, either property will ensure that the
coefficient matrix is invertible. If  g(h) has a sill A then  A-g(h) is positive 
definite but in general A-g(h) is not positive definite (because in particular it is 
unbounded). This transition is purely a scheme to
improve the efficiency of the equation solver and not one to obtain covariance like 
properties for A-g(h).  You can't use the "pseudocovariance" in the Simple Kriging 
equations, the coefficient matrix will likely
not be invertible.

Perhaps someone is using this term to denote something other than A-g(h), otherwise 
there would be no particular reason to have such a function in S Plus

DEMyers
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~donaldm



Pierre Goovaerts wrote:

> Hi Celia,
>
> To compute the pseudo-cross covariance
> for an unbounded model, you just substract the
> semivariogram model g(h) from any positive value A,
> such that A-g(h) is non-negative for all h.
> The non-bias condition of the ordinary kriging system
> allows the constant A to cancel out from the system
> of equations, hence the choice of the value A has
> no impact on the computation of kriging weights and
> kriging variance.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pierre
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
>   ________      ________
>  |        \    /        |    Pierre Goovaerts
>  |_        \  /        _|    Assistant professor
>  __|________\/________|__    Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering
> |                        |   The University of Michigan
> |     M I C H I G A N    |   EWRE Building, Room 117
> |________________________|   Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2125, U.S.A
>   _|    |_\    /_|    |_
>  |        |\  /|        |    E-mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  |________| \/ |________|    Phone:   (734) 936-0141
>                              Fax:     (734) 763-2275
>                              http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~goovaert/
>
> <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, celia bulit wrote:
>
> > Hi all:
> >
> > does anyone know how to calculate the "pseudo covariance function" for an
> > unbounded semivariogram?
> > Does it exist the funtion for S-Plus?
> >
> > thanks in advance
> > Celia
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > Celia Bulit
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Depto El Hombre y su Ambiente
> > UAM-Xochimilco
> > Calzada del Hueso 1100
> > 04960 M�xico D.F.
> >
> > tel. (52) 5483-7360
> >
> >
> > --
> > * To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any 
>useful responses to your questions.
> > * To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and 
>"unsubscribe ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO 
>NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
> > * Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org
> >
>
> --
> * To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful 
>responses to your questions.
> * To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and 
>"unsubscribe ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO 
>NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
> * Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org


--
* To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful 
responses to your questions.
* To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe 
ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND 
Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list
* Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org

Reply via email to