you wrote: > your English beats my attempts at any other language hands down. my > only question (I'm not a cokriging expert) is regarding the potential > for measurement error: if deer are continually on the move, then I > wonder if you might, by force, end up with a substantial positioning > error contribution to the nugget? cheers, Brian Gray > So, Brian, probably communication problems are even deeper than I expected. After a quarter of an hour of English dictionary consultation (to translate your first sentence), I think to have concluded that perhaps my English is as bad as my 'statisticish'. My density estimate is obtained by 'averaging' the position of deer by radiotelemetry, i.e., given a population in a place, I put some boundaries on a map, and I count the fraction of positions of the radiotagged sample of the population that are inside these boundaries. My aim is to obtain in this way the 'average density' in that place. Do you think this procedure could avoid the problems that deer mobility can give to the reliability of the confidence interval? And then, as I never listened about positioning error contribution to the nugget, where could I find some references? Thank you very much! Daniele -- * To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful responses to your questions. * To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list * Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org
