> Meng-Ying, > > For interests sake could you perform the same experiment for a > stationary sample set of size 1000. > > Regards Digby
I did that. But with this short influence range of just 3 lags in a population of size 1000 (0.3% of the domain), the correlation of data doesn't do much influence to the population variance. That's why I looked into other data set to speak for me. For people interested in this phenomenum, I used the second realization of SGSIM.OUT in the GSLIB manual as the population, add coordiate to this realization by <addcoord>, calculated omni-directional variogram by <gamv>, and on the screen of <gamv> calculation it shows the overall variance, which doesn't fit the sill in the variogram if you put the maximum lag distance to 30. Mng-yng On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, Digby Millikan wrote: > Meng-Ying, > > For interests sake could you perform the same experiment for a stationary > sample set of size 1000. > > Regards Digby > > >
* By using the ai-geostats mailing list you agree to follow its rules ( see http://www.ai-geostats.org/help_ai-geostats.htm ) * To unsubscribe to ai-geostats, send the following in the subject or in the body (plain text format) of an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signoff ai-geostats
