Why don't you krige the percentage error of the actual value, or something to that effect rather than the absolute error?
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose Luis Gomez Dans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pierre Goovaerts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 2:02 AM
Subject: RE: [ai-geostats] Interpolation error estimation
--- Pierre Goovaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:You could try using kriging with non-systematic error where you can directly incorporate information on the reliability of your data in the kriging system. The technique is described in Chiles and Delfiner's textbook.
Pierre, thnaks for your reply. However, I want to estimate the error in areas where I have no data based on the error in areas where I have data. I'm not interested in actually doing the interpolation of the measured field, but rather finding the error.
Of course, I haven't actually got the text from Chiles, and I might be wrong, but is this the case?
Again, many thanks Jose
___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - want a free and easy way to contact your friends online? http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* By using the ai-geostats mailing list you agree to follow its rules ( see http://www.ai-geostats.org/help_ai-geostats.htm )
* To unsubscribe to ai-geostats, send the following in the subject or in the body (plain text format) of an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signoff ai-geostats
* By using the ai-geostats mailing list you agree to follow its rules ( see http://www.ai-geostats.org/help_ai-geostats.htm )
* To unsubscribe to ai-geostats, send the following in the subject or in the body (plain text format) of an email message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signoff ai-geostats
