|
Hi
Perry,
Well,
I tend to stick with the simple calculation. Which values would you use to
interpret Z.
Off
the cuff, I'd day just stick with the calculation,
because :
1. It
will be much quicker than interpolating Z - time, time,
time!
2. If
the relationship is X+Y then a simple calculation is completely acceptable from
an auditors point of view, therefore standard/common
practice.
3. No
need to define and test the Z interpolation method - time, time,
time!
Hope
this helps.
Regards,
Colin
Hi
list
I would
appreciate some feedback on standard/common practice for calculation of
fields in models.
eg:
If I
interpolate X and Y in my model from X and Y data (eg: drill holes), and
I ultimately want Z = X + Y, what is the difference between calculating Z
= X + Y in samples and then interpolating Z versus calculating Z AFTER X and Y
have been interpolated (besides the obvious potential change in spatial
characteristics of the variable)...?
Cheers
Perry
Perry Collier
Senior Mine
Geologist Ernest Henry Mine Xstrata Copper Australia ( (07) 4769 4527 4 (07) 4769 4555 * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
" http://www.xstrata.com PO Box 527 Cloncurry QLD 4824 Australia
"Light travels faster
than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them
speak"
**********************************************************************
The information contained in this
e-mail is confidential and is
intended only for the use of the
addressee(s).
If you receive this e-mail in
error, any use, distribution or
copying of this e-mail is not
permitted. You are requested to
forward unwanted e-mail and
address any problems to the
Xstrata Queensland Support
Centre.
Support Centre e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Support Centre phone: Australia
1800 500 646
International +61 2 9034 3710
**********************************************************************
|