Yes, the standardization is made for each layer separately (and so the back transformation).
Actually I'm going to calculate the anomalies...and then let's see!
In this case I'm lucky because of the sampling along Z is regular.
Sincerely
Sebastiano
At 12.46 28/08/2006, Isobel Clark wrote:
Sebastiano
Your standardisation produces a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1, without changing the characteristics of the semi-variogram (range, relative nugget effect etc.)
I presume you will standardise each 'layer' separately? Then use a 3D search which does not include samples from layers above and below the current one. Sounds very neat and efficient if your layers are flat and horizontal.
Yes, I would definitely try that and see what you get. Let us know!
All the best
Isobel
http://www.kriging.com
