Tomas et al.:

Tomas Hlasny wrote:
Thank`s to everybody who already provided help on this topic.
We used SAS PROC MIXED, as you recomended (but some older version) to carry the ANOVA with autocorrelated data.
A caution: it is my recollection that PROC MIXED in some earlier versions of SAS (what version did you use?) was troubled by some bugs...When you wrote in question 1 that "only the latter one worked properly," what did you mean?

Could somebody help me with these points?
1. What indicates which procedure on calculation of DDDF is appropriate - the options are KW (Kenward and Roger), Sattertwaith (modification of KW) and RESIDUALS. Only the latter one worked properly - MODEL DDFM = Residuals. We used it just by trial and error, do not understand the differences between the methods. Can somebody briefly explain?
1. In my understanding (I am a soil scientist with a good grounding in statistics, but not a statistician...), this is not a simple issue. In Proc MIXED and linear mixed models in general, null distributions of the test statistics are often unknown, and p-values cannot be computed exactly. Kenward-Roger was recommended to us because it inflates (appropriately) the estimated variance-covariance matrix of the fixed and random effects. Descriptions of the various DDFM options in SAS PROC MIXED are available in the SAS online documentation (http://support.sas.com/onlinedoc/913/docMainpage.jsp). An interesting discussion of these issues and a comparison of the various options can be found in "Approximations to Distributions of Test Statistics in Complex Mixed Linear Models Using SASĀ® Proc MIXED" (Schaalje et al.) available at http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p262-26.pdf.


2. The result of the analysis is just like of normal ANOVA - there is statistical difference between the groups, i.e. at least one differ from the others (not very usefull info). Thus I need to carry out some post hoc test (Duncan, Tukey ...) - is there some way how to do it in the case of autocorrelated data?
2. In PROC MIXED, you can use LSMEANS statements with the appropriate options (e.g., PDIFF, ADJUST) to calculate the least-square estimated means for fixed effects in the model and request multiple comparisons among/between them. CONTRAST and ESTIMATE statements can also be used to generate appropriate comparisons among treatments or fixed effect factor levels.

--
Jeffrey G. White, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Soil Science
3207 Williams Hall
North Carolina State University
Campus Box 7619
Raleigh, NC  27695-7619
Tel: 919-515-2389 Fax: 919-515-2167
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to