Hi Abani

 

Actually, the idea of calculating the regression slope (for each block) from
the kriging variance etc. was put forth by Vann etc. in a paper called
Quantitative Kriging Neighbourhood Analysis for the Mining Geologist - A
Description of the Method With Worked Case Examples. The idea proposed by
the paper is that a regression slope of 1.0 indicates conditionally unbiased
estimates. However, this idea is based on theory with rigorous assumptions
and doesn't work very well in practice. You can test it by cross validation
and see for yourself.  


Vanns' paper goes further and argues that one should design a kriging search
neighborhood by trial and error with the objective of obtaining a regression
slope of 1.0 to insure the estimates of any or all kriged models are
conditionally unbiased. However, this advice is misleading or to put it
bluntly, wrong. In order for the grade-tonnage curves of a long term mine
planning model or ore resource model to predict unbiased recoveries, the
kriged estimates themselves must necessarily be conditionally biased! See
"THE KRIGING OXYMORON: A CONDITIONALLY UNBIASED AND ACCURATE PREDICTOR " for
proof. The only exception is the case where the kriged estimates will
actually be used for selection at the time of mining, e.g. grade control. 


To summarize - if the kriged estimates are going to be used for selection at
the time of mining (grade control), then conditionally unbiased estimates
are desirable. For all other models such as mine planning block models or
resource models - forget about conditional bias. It is irrelevant. 


Both of these papers can be downloaded from  <http://www.isaaks.com/>
www.isaaks.com  by clicking on  "Geo Docs".


 

Hope this helps,

ed

 

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Abani R Samal
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 9:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: AI-GEOSTATS: Kriging variance, lagrangian multiplier

 

My First question:

I am using a mining software to get a krigged block model. The tool also
saves a parameter called "Slope of Regression". The "Slope of Regression" is
defined as 

(Block Variance - Kriging Variance
+Lagrange_multiplier)/(Block_variance-KrigingVariance+2*abs(Lagrange_Multipl
ier)) provided the denominator is not zero.

 

Unfortunately, there is NO literature available (Including no help file). I
have hard time to understand what this  "Slope of Regression"means and how
this slope is usable.

 

I'll highly appreciate your thought on this.

 

My second question:

 

If s is the sample, v is the block and V is the whole panel of blocks or the
whole deposit, the Krige's additive relation can be written as: σ 2 (s,V) =
σ2(s,v) + σ2(v,V)

 

But how is: σ2(s,V) related to σ2ok?  (σ2okKriging variance), under what
condition?

 

 

 

Abani R Samal

Lakewood, CO

 

 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to