Marc Haber wrote: > It's very good to see aide being developed again. I know how hard it > is to judge development time, but I'd like to know what your plans are > for future aide 0.11 release candidates and later the actual 0.11 > release.
I am trying to get the large file support to work under HP-UX before releasing 0.11-rc2. That should take about 1 week. After that it depends if there are any issues with that release before it can become the final 0.11. > Is it wise to putt 0.11rc into Debian experimental, or will I have to > fight with 0.10 in unstable, testing and stable for months until 0.11 > is finally released and thus suitable for Debian unstable and testin? I would expect the final 0.11 release to be out within 1 month from now. > May I ask whether you have a roadmap planned and how things are > currently going? Judging from the traffic on this list, the > experiences with 0.11rc1 are not very bad. One issue reported by Michael Schwendt (package maintainer of aide in Fedora Extras) is that the i18n/gettext part of aide which includes an old Russian translation is broken. This needs to be resolved before releasing 0.11. Since the original translator is no longer available, I am tempted to get rid of the internationalization, and just go with English. Beyond aide 0.11, there really is no clear roadmap. There are a few changes I like to make before moving to a 1.0 version. But it all depends on available time. I usually am able to fix reproducable bugs in CVS, but a regular release process takes up more time than I have to spare at the moment. If anyone is willing to help out, especially with automake/autoconf magic, please step forward. The right way to do that is to join the aide-devel list at http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aide-devel and drop us a line there. Sincerely, Richard van den Berg _______________________________________________ Aide mailing list Aide@cs.tut.fi https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide
