I'm currently running a complete test on two different machines, on each of the following:
NORMAL sha256 sha512 md5 Do you happen to know, are all of the above capable of detecting corrupt files or single bit flips? I would imagine md5 would be the quickest, but is it enough protection? I'm not trying to keep the NSA out, ha ha. On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Richard van den Berg <[email protected]>wrote: > Andy Lawrence wrote On 20-01-14 18:06: > >> Most definitely CPU bound. >> > > In that case the sha256 from FIPSR and the sha512 are the bottleneck. > Maybe search for a hash algorithm that performs better on your hardware. > Select a subset of files and test the performance before you settle on a > final aide.conf to use on your whole system. > > > Kind regards, > > Richard > _______________________________________________ > Aide mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide > -- projecthuh.com Never underestimate the carelessness of boredom... Most people prefer Windows because most people are idiots...
_______________________________________________ Aide mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.cs.tut.fi/mailman/listinfo/aide
