Thanks Robie, I would suggest this testcase, but it's so contrived, I'm not sure it's going to be reasonable to test:
Run Munin; get into a situaation where the rrd data is older than the graph period in Munin (e.g., some communication error to the Munin node) and Munin will throw an error. But this is probably too vague to be a 'testcase' and without clearer steps for reproduction, it's not obvious how to SRU this change. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of AIMS, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1322264 Title: Munin fails to generate graph, stat should be less than end Status in munin package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in munin source package in Trusty: Won't Fix Bug description: [Impact] * If rrd data is older than the graph period i.e. a week the graph fails to generate with error 'start should be less than end'. [Test Case] [Regression Potential] * This is a rather small and obvious bugfix from upstream. The only issue potentially is if a user manually backported the fix to their local code. Presuming they took the code directly from upstream, then there is no problem, as the new code will be identical to their manual change. --- If rrd data is older than the graph period i.e. a week the graph fails to generate with error 'start should be less than end' issue has been reported and resolved upstream. Upstream issue http://munin-monitoring.org/ticket/1358 and upstream fix http://munin- monitoring.org/changeset/57243edbb3ce8a40a774826b37a1852530778721/munin The fix is minor, and effects trusty (I've not tested other versions). To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/1322264/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~aims Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~aims More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
