I would like to volunteer, but I might need some help from others !
Currently I am working on some refactoring of xbaya code, once I am done I
will look in to this.

Lahiru

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:05 PM, [email protected] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Right now, the design of GFAC is that it has the Registry Interface i.e.
> save and load HostDescription, list of HostDescription with a given service
> name, etc. The only implementation, we have now, is JCR (Jack Rabbit),
> which
> does fine for simple operations e.g. query, insert, update. delete.
>
> With the current design, I think we can plug in XRegistry (by implementing
> the Registry Interface using XRegistry client) if we want to. But, we might
> need to change some part of XRegistry to work with this interface.
>
> Patanachai
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 8, 2011, at 8:50 PM, Marlon Pierce wrote:
> >
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > What's the status of the JCR work?
> >
> > I will let others chime in, but as far as I can tell (mostly from JIRA
> > tickets and commits), GFac is fully using JCR. XBaya is using to some
> > purposes but not all. Before we get to a release, the only (or big)
> missing
> > development item (other than documentation and test cases) is to tie the
> > loose ends of registry usage. But it will be nice to focus on one API and
> > JCR seems to be the way to go. Having XRegistry into the mix might add
> > unnecessary complexity (especially with legacy Grid Security tightly
> > integrated).
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Marlon
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/8/11 8:35 PM, Suresh Marru wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> Since we decided to move towards JCR compatible registries [1] [2]
> > >> and build over out of the box open source solutions like jack
> > >> rabbit, I see no reason for us to maintain XRegistry. I suggest we
> > >> move it to attic (or delete it) and deprecate support for it from
> > >> GFac and XRegistry.
> > >>
> > >> Opinions?
> > >>
> > >> Cheers, Suresh
> > >>
> > >> [1] - http://goo.gl/UWPeq [2] -
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRAVATA-73
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
> > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> > >
> > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOaWLPAAoJEOEgD2XReDo5QLcH/Ak3mZDhSbI2a6NfEmhhbASp
> > > iXPmBhDT7FWS7zS2lzDoBvuRY3HXx8vCGTTYZ7GPahs+nmtZ5taik3Enpb4cfVcn
> > > R4m5q5vQ5dTSby2h1GUe22hmWvp/4imWwZsMEdt69XF8M/ctZb4av0m1MhPr5R0w
> > > yLVa5yg0SeRXZqoLAbFBENuHGhwwSvSKVrArdvPH2X6qFa5LFEDSqiHBdvYQ4/JR
> > > cYbzhiTlhRisd1zV4oMjRBQYUgBNw6kMnw8l685bQLguQlbTBMVnhLcJf2Od3KHg
> > > +PG69ooxSV14dOgU0UxxTNumw6D7xlNGIGUuz7QewZrqN2so2LH6XerZw0ZPymk=
> > > =CqmT
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Patanachai Tangchaisin
>



-- 
System Analyst Programmer
PTI Lab
Indiana University

Reply via email to